Mechanical and Safety Engineering has extensive experience with industrial machine guarding accidents with a wide variety of machinery. Guarding accidents can cover a very wide range of products. Guarding accidents occur when a poultry worker bypasses machine safeguards and gets injured, when a saw operator is cut on a spinning blade, when a press operator is crushed by a power press, when a machine operator is caught in an in-running nip point (the place where two opposing rotating mechanisms meet), when a person is cut by a lawnmower blade, when a farmer is injured or killed by agricultural machinery, and a multitude of possible scenarios. \n.<\/p>\n\n
<\/p>
MASE often handles cases involving machine guarding. Industrial machinery often contain large amounts of mechanical energy. This results in high forces that are applied to the part and anything in its path. Inadequate machine guarding will inevitably result in accidents. Machines must be safeguarded so that it is impossible for a machine operator to be exposed to the point of operation of the machine, the place where the mechanical energy is released. MASE personnel have the experience to determine if an industrial accident is due to inadequate safeguarding, safeguard malfunction, or due to tampering with safety interlock devices. <\/p>
<\/p>
Extensive standards specify the requisite measures to ensure protection from mechanical hazards. These industry standards can be used to determine if a machine has the necessary safety features, and whether the machine meets safety standards for the time period during which it was produced. Showing either compliance or violation of these industry standards is typically adequate to show a machine is safe or unreasonably dangerous. <\/p>
<\/p>
MASE has extensive experience developing guarding solutions to industrial machinery. Basic engineering principles can be applied to develop guarding solutions to every type of machine-related hazard. Failure of the manufacturer of a machine to provide adequate safeguarding can cause the manufacturer to be held responsible for injuries and damages by the machine. Employers of machine operators also are required by federal law to provide a safe working environment for their workers – this includes ensuring that machines are adequately guarded. Employers are often blamed and found responsible when the manufacturer of a machine is the party truly responsible for producing a safe product in the first place. Federal law can unfortunately protect manufacturers producing unsafe, faulty machinery. MASE believe that manufacturers are responsible for producing safe products – they have the expertise to fully understand the hazards of the product, and how to eliminate or safeguard those hazards. This said, employers are required by law to ensure that their workers are not exposed to hazards, and should employ safety engineers to ensure that their facilities do not contain unknown hazards that manufacturers have failed to remove or safeguard. <\/p>
<\/p>
MASE provides engineering expert witness analysis, opinions, and testimony for your machine guarding case. Machine guarding accident cases usually involve machines that were produced without necessary guarding, or machines that have had their safeguards removed and\/or bypassed. MASE can quickly and efficiently identify unguarded machine hazards as well as unnecessary machine hazards that could have been eliminated completely at the design stage. If a machine meets industry standards and engineering design protocol, we are happy to defend the safety features of a machine. <\/p>\n
Common machine hazards can include the following:<\/p>\n
A nip point is a hazardous area created\nby two or more mechanical parts rotating in the same plane in close proximity\nto each part, in opposite directions. These are also referred to as in-running\nnip points. The hazard here is the\npotential to get pulled into the machinery. \nSome nip points are designed to pull material into them in order for a\nmachine to perform some alteration on the material, while some nip points are\nthe result of power transmission and are not specifically designed to pull\nmaterial into the machine. When an\nobject, piece of clothing, or part of a person\u2019s body contacts the nip point, the\ndrive components will pull the object into the machine, when the forces acting\non the object exceed the forces preventing the object from moving. The drive components will place resultant\nforces on the object perpendicular from the rotational point of the drive. For an object to get pulled in, there must be\nsome sort of interference between the object and the drive components. The turning drive components will exert a\nfrictional force on the object, the magnitude dependent on the interference and\nthe amount of force being transmitted based on the this interference. The fixed drive components will pull the\nobject into the machine when there is enough rotational friction force to pull\nthe object or person into the machine.<\/span><\/p>\n\n Example of a nip point<\/strong><\/p>\n Catastrophic injuries often result from\nbeing pulled into an in-running nip point. \nDepending on the distance between the drive components, the nature of\nthe drive components\u2019 surface characteristics, and the amount of force driving\nthe machine, person\u2019s entire body can get pulled into a machine, or it may be\nlimited to a limb. When a limb is pulled\ninto a nip point, the body of the person may act as a physical barrier that\nprevents the rest of the body from becoming pulled in. Degloving injuries can occur after the\nperson\u2019s limb is pulled into the nip point. \nWhen the body of the victim stops further entanglement in the hazard,\nthe rotating drive mechanisms may tear the person\u2019s flesh from their body. While these are gruesome details, it is\nimportant for a machine designer to be aware what can and does occur with\nimproperly guarded machinery. <\/span><\/p> \n\n\n\n<\/p> Examples of nip point hazards can be\nfound on the drive mechanisms of conveyors, gears and pulleys. These mechanisms\nare extremely dangerous as a machine operator can get pulled into the machine,\ncausing potential catastrophic body damage. \nMachine operators have been pulled into nip points when loose clothing\nbecame entangled in the nip point. Often\nthere are large amounts of force driving the components in nip points, as is\nthe case in the following figure. Any\naccidental contact with a high power nip point will result in extreme physical\nmutilation or death.